<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Anesthesia Progress Blog &#187; Stabident</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/tag/stabident/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com</link>
	<description>Blog invites submissions of review articles, reports on clinical techniques, case reports, conference summaries, and articles of opinion pertinent to the control of pain and anxiety in dentistry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 11:29:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Postoperative Pain of Two Intraosseous Anesthetic Techniques: DISCUSSION part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-discussion-part-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-discussion-part-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Oct 2009 14:37:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anesthesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intraosseous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stabident]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/?p=496</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
With respect to postoperative pain, the 2 subjects who were reperforated (1 Stabident and 1 X-Tip™) could have had a small effect on postoperative pain. However, it is very unlikely that the administration of an additional 0.3 mL of anesthetic solution for the infiltration would have had an effect on postoperative pain.
Postinjection pain ratings, at [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-discussion-part-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postoperative Pain of Two Intraosseous Anesthetic Techniques: DISCUSSION</title>
		<link>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-discussion.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-discussion.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 14:34:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anesthesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intraosseous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stabident]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/?p=494</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For the Stabident and X-Tip™ techniques, needle insertion for the infiltration injection, into alveolar mucosa, resulted in mild pain ratings, with 2-10% of the subjects reporting moderate pain and no reports of severe pain (Table 1). The mean VAS ratings were 34 for the Stabident technique and 28 for the X-Tip™ technique, which would be [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-discussion.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postoperative Pain of Two Intraosseous Anesthetic Techniques: RESULTS</title>
		<link>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-results.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-results.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 14:34:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anesthesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intraosseous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stabident]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/?p=490</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forty-one adult subjects, 24 men and 17 women, from age 19 to 43 years with an average age of 26 years, participated. Because we studied a young adult population, the results of this study may not apply to children or the elderly.
The pain ratings for the infiltration injections are pre­sented in Table 1. The majority [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-results.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postoperative Pain of Two Intraosseous Anesthetic Techniques: MATERIALS AND METHODS</title>
		<link>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-materials-and-methods.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-materials-and-methods.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:17:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anesthesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intraosseous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stabident]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/?p=485</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Forty-one adult subjects, 24 men and 17 women, participated in this study. The subjects were in good health and were not taking any medications that would alter pain perception. The Ohio State University Human Subjects Review Committee approved the study and written informed consent was obtained from each subject.
Twenty-four mandibular left and 17 right sides [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques-materials-and-methods.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Postoperative Pain of Two Intraosseous Anesthetic Techniques</title>
		<link>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:07:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Anesthesia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intraosseous]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Pain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stabident]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/?p=481</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The intraosseous injection (IO) allows placement of a local anesthetic directly into the cancellous bone adjacent to the tooth to be anesthetized. Currently, there is an intraosseous injection system marketed under the name Stabident (Fairfax Dental Inc, Miami, Fla). This system is comprised of a slow-speed handpiece driven perforator, a solid 27-gauge wire with a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.anesthesiaprogress.com/postoperative-pain-of-two-intraosseous-anesthetic-techniques.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

