In: Anesthesia
1 Nov 2009
The effectiveness of topical anesthesia to reduce needle insertion pain has been met with mixed results. In our study, topical anesthetic effectiveness was found to be related to the location of the injection. For the inferior alveolar nerve block injection (Figure), no significant difference was found between the no pain/pain ratings when topical anesthetic was used. Our results and those of Nakanishi et al and Meechan et al agree on the lack of effectiveness of 20% benzocaine in reducing pain during needle insertion in the pterygomandibular raphe area when using a 27-gauge needle for an inferior alveolar nerve block. Similarly, topical anesthetic did not significantly reduce the pain of needle insertion over the maxillary first molars (Figure).
In: Anesthesia
31 Oct 2009A total of 1080 patients with a mean age of 25 years (range 18-49 years) participated in this study and received a total of 2336 injections. There were 1635 injections (1121 men/514 women) in the inferior alveolar nerve block group with an age range of 18-49 years (mean = 25), 279 injections (197 men/82 women) in the maxillary first molar infiltration group with an age range of 19-43 years (mean = 26), and 422 injections (297 men/125 women) in the maxillary lateral incisor infiltration group with an age range of 19-43 years (mean = 26). Within the inferior alveolar nerve block group, 470 injections received topical anesthetic prior to needle insertion, whereas 1165 did not. In the maxillary lateral incisor infiltration group, 128 injections received topical anesthetic and 294 did not. In the maxillary first molar infiltration group, 122 injections received topical anesthetic prior to needle insertion and 157 received none. The age and sex of each subject, by individual injection within the topical and no topical groups, was not recorded in the original studies.
Read the rest of this entry »
In: Anesthesia
30 Oct 2009A total of 1080 adult patients participated in this study. They received a total of 2336 injections. Patients included in this retrospective study were participants in 25 independent, cross-over anesthetic research studies conducted at The Ohio State University. All patients were in good health as determined by a written health history and oral questioning. No patient was taking any medication that would alter pain perception. All patients were asymptomatic and volunteered for participation in their respective studies. The Ohio State University Human Subjects Committee approved each study, and written informed consent was obtained from each patient. Patients received either a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block, an infiltration over a maxillary lateral incisor, or a maxillary infiltration over a first molar. A 27-gauge needle was used for each injection.
In: Anesthesia
29 Oct 2009
Fear of the needle has been reported as one of the major causes of apprehension in dental patients. Patients have reported that the feeling of the needle being inserted into the tissue is a chief source of anxiety. Empirically, it makes sense to attempt to reduce this source of anxiety and assure the patient that everything possible is being done to make their appointment comfortable. Topical anesthesia has been advocated for the reduction of a patient’s anxiety and pain.
In: Anesthesia
28 Oct 2009Sedation combined with local anesthesia is a safe alternative to general anesthesia because spontaneous reflexes and patient cooperation are retained while fear and apprehension (common reasons to delay dental care) are reduced. Local anesthetic techniques are often complemented by the balanced use of low doses of analgesic and sedative/hypnotic drugs to provide analgesia, anxiolysis, and sedation. Recovery is then more rapid and patients are more clear-headed, making this technique invaluable for outpatient medical and surgical procedures. Mepivacaine 2% (with 1/20,000 levonor-defrin) has been successfully used intraosseously to supplement inferior alveolar dental blocks for molar extraction. Newer dental local anaesthetics (such as arti-caine) and especially more longer-acting local anaesthetics (such as levobupivicaine) have the capacity for better postoperative pain control and for longer periods.
In: Anesthesia
27 Oct 2009Patients in the 2 groups were similar with respect to age, height, weight, gender distribution, and length of surgery (Table 1). There were no significant differences (P = .05) in age, weight, blood pressures (systolic, diastolic, mean arterial), pulse oximetry oxygen saturation, pegboard tests between the 2 groups at the various time intervals measured (Table 2). With regard to the perioperative sedation and anxiety levels at the different intervals, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups (P = .05). Analysis of the propofol administered revealed that almost equal amounts were given in both groups during surgery (tramadol group 206.8 mg ± 66.9; placebo group 206.0 ± 48.7). No or minimal technical difficulties were experienced by the surgeon in patients in either group. No nausea, vomiting, and dizziness were noted in either group, and similar recovery-room scores were obtained in both groups during the first 4 hours postoperatively. No significant (P < .05) cardiovascular depression or fall in oxygen saturations were found in either group during the first 4 hours postoperatively. However, 3 patients self-reported nausea and vomiting after discharge, all being in the tramadol group. The 2 patients in the tramadol group that did not receive rescue analgesia reported no nausea or vomiting.
In: Anesthesia
26 Oct 2009Forty-five healthy male or female patients aged 18-55 years scheduled to undergo surgical removal of an impacted mandibular third molar were eligible for participation in the study (see Table 1 for demographic data). All patients required bone removal and suturing. Exclusion criteria were as follows: pregnancy or lactation; use of anticoagulants, analgesics, or any central nervous system depressants; hypersensitivity to opioids or any other medication likely to interfere with the study drugs. Treatment with any analgesic whatsoever was forbidden for 24 hours prior to surgery. Ethical approval was obtained from the Hospital and University Ethical Committee and written informed consent from all the patients involved in the study.
Blog invites submissions of review articles, reports on clinical techniques, case reports, conference summaries, and articles of opinion pertinent to the control of pain and anxiety in dentistry.