In: Anesthesia
21 Sep 2009Patients in the 2 groups were similar with respect to age, height, weight, gender distribution, and length of surgery, and the number of teeth removed (Table 1). There were no significant differences (P = .05) in the physiological parameters, namely blood pressures (systolic, diastolic, mean arterial), heart rates, respiratory rates, and oxygen saturation between the 2 groups at the various time intervals measured (Table 2). With regard to the preoperative sedation and anxiety levels at the intervals post-drug administration, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups (P = 0.05) (Figures 1 and 2). Significantly more patients in the S/ M group accepted the nasal premedication (chi-square test = 7.718, P = .021; Table 3). No significant differences were found in the ease of mask induction (P = .05; Table 4). No adverse effects like nausea, vomiting, itching, and excessive sedation were observed in either group. There were no significant differences seen between the 2 groups as far as postoperative recovery went (P = .05; Table 4). The Oucher facial pain scale showed the S/M group to experience less pain than those in the K/M group, although this was not statistically significant (P > .05) (Table 4). In the S/M group, 72% of children were responders as compared with 52% in the K/M group (P > .05; Figure 3). Using the word graphic rating scale and the modified Hannalah objective pain scale (Table 4 and Figures 4 and 5), no significant differences were found between the 2 groups at the various time intervals measured postoperatively (P – .05).
Table 1. Demographic Profile and Baseline Vital Signs in the 2 Groups*
| Group S/M Mean ± SD |
Group K/M Mean ± SD |
|||
|
Age (year) |
5.87 ± |
1.33 |
5.68 ± |
1.31 |
|
Weight (kg) |
17.80 ± |
2.72 |
17.17 ± |
3.09 |
|
Number of teeth |
10.68 ± |
3.77 |
10.63 ± |
4.26 |
|
Heart rate |
94.48 ± |
26.22 |
105.16 ± |
20.64 |
|
(beats/min) |
||||
|
Duration of surgery |
20.64 ± |
6.60 |
19.96 ± |
4.95 |
|
Gender |
||||
|
Male |
15 |
12 |
||
|
Female |
10 |
13 |
||
|
* S/M indicates sufentanil/midazolam; K/M, ketamine/mid-azolam. |
||||
Table 2. Psyhological parametrs levitra plus
Table 3. Acceptance of Intranasal Spray*
|
Good |
Moderate |
Poor |
Total |
|
|
Group K/M |
4 |
9 |
12 |
25 |
|
Group S/M |
7 | 15 |
3 |
25 |
|
Total |
11 | 24 |
15 |
50 |
Table 4. Mask Acceptance Score, Recovery Room Score, and Pain Measures*
|
Mean ± SD |
||||
|
S/M group, mask induction acceptance score K/M group, mask induction acceptance score |
42.40 ± 2.92 39.69 ± 7.49 | |||
|
Time |
30 minutes |
60 minutes |
90 minutes |
120 minutes |
|
S/M group, recovery room score K/M group recovery room score S/M group, sum of Hannalah scale (%) K/M group, sum of Hannalah scale (%) |
78.40 ± 15.46 74.80 ± 13.88 29.00 ± 25.36 26.00 ± 22.35 | 81.60 ± 8.50 80.00 ± 7.64 21.33 ± 24.66 14.33 ± 14.74 | 11.33 ± 13.58 10.67 ± 13.29 | 81.67 ± 6.37 79.58 ± 10.42 10.33 ± 12.33 9.33 ± 12.80 |
|
Child |
Mother |
Researcher |
||
|
S/M group, oucher sum K/M group, oucher sum |
86.40 ± 85.82 115.20 ± 89.36 |
86.00 ± 85.63 115.60 ± 88.98 |
84.00 ± 83.22 114.00 ± 90.00 |
|
|
* S/M indicates subfentanil/midazolam; K/M, ketamine/midazolam. |
||||
Table 5. Modified Hannalah Objective Pain Scale
| Observation | Criteria |
Points |
|
Blood Pressure |
± 10% preop |
0 |
|
>20% preop |
1 | |
|
>30% preop |
2 | |
|
Crying |
Not crying |
0 |
|
Crying but responds to tender |
1 | |
|
loving care |
||
|
Crying and does not respond |
2 | |
|
to tender loving care |
||
|
Movement |
None |
0 |
|
Restless |
1 | |
|
Thrashing |
2 | |
|
Agitation |
Patient asleep or calm |
0 |
|
Mild |
1 | |
|
Hysterical |
2 | |
|
Posture |
No special posture |
0 |
|
Flexing limbs |
1 | |
|
Holding mouth |
2 | |
|
Complaints of pain |
Asleep or states no pain |
0 |
|
Cannot localize |
1 | |
|
Can localize |
2 |
Figure 1. Sedation score: 15 and 20 minutes post-drug administration. viagra plus
Figure 2. Anxiety scale: baseline, 15, and 20 minutes post-drug administration.
Figure 3. Oucher score categories for observer/researcher.
Figure 4. Word graphic rating scale for observer/researcher.
Figure 5. Modified Hannalah objective pain scale: for observer/researcher.
Blog invites submissions of review articles, reports on clinical techniques, case reports, conference summaries, and articles of opinion pertinent to the control of pain and anxiety in dentistry.